Kindle Paperwhite
和 Author, 托馬斯·麥肯托什（Thomas Mackintosh）
，更多细节参见搜狗输入法
I'll admit this is a bit idealistic. The history of open formats is littered with standards that won on paper and lost in practice. Companies have strong incentives to make their context files just different enough that switching costs remain high. The fact that we already have CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md and .cursorrules coexisting rather than one universal format, is evidence that fragmentation is the default, not the exception. And the ETH Zürich paper is a reminder that even when the format exists, writing good context files is harder than it sounds. Most people will write bad ones, and bad context files are apparently worse than none at all.。业内人士推荐Mail.ru账号,Rambler邮箱,海外俄语邮箱作为进阶阅读
I write this as a practitioner, not as a critic. After more than 10 years of professional dev work, I’ve spent the past 6 months integrating LLMs into my daily workflow across multiple projects. LLMs have made it possible for anyone with curiosity and ingenuity to bring their ideas to life quickly, and I really like that! But the number of screenshots of silently wrong output, confidently broken logic, and correct-looking code that fails under scrutiny I have amassed on my disk shows that things are not always as they seem. My conclusion is that LLMs work best when the user defines their acceptance criteria before the first line of code is generated.